<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to use Robocopy multi-threaded feature to speed up file copy on Windows 10	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pureinfotech.com/robocopy-multithreaded-file-copy-windows-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pureinfotech.com/robocopy-multithreaded-file-copy-windows-10/</link>
	<description>Pureinfotech is the best site to get Windows help – featuring friendly how-to guides on Windows 10, Windows 11, Xbox, and other things tech, news, deals, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 11:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: samot1		</title>
		<link>https://pureinfotech.com/robocopy-multithreaded-file-copy-windows-10/#comment-16843</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[samot1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pureinfotech.com/?p=95164#comment-16843</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[be aware of the /ZB parameter (Uses restartable mode). I tested it a few years ago and it crippeled the speed, because it writes the process in the first block of the file, so it write those block hundred thousand times (for bigger files - for smaller ones this parameter makes much less sense). But of course there may be environments, where it works fine (other hardware / anti virus / network protocols ...), so test it for you :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>be aware of the /ZB parameter (Uses restartable mode). I tested it a few years ago and it crippeled the speed, because it writes the process in the first block of the file, so it write those block hundred thousand times (for bigger files &#8211; for smaller ones this parameter makes much less sense). But of course there may be environments, where it works fine (other hardware / anti virus / network protocols &#8230;), so test it for you :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MariaXavi		</title>
		<link>https://pureinfotech.com/robocopy-multithreaded-file-copy-windows-10/#comment-16748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MariaXavi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2021 03:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pureinfotech.com/?p=95164#comment-16748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fastcopy , Carbonite , GS Richcopy 360 are much faster than Robocopy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fastcopy , Carbonite , GS Richcopy 360 are much faster than Robocopy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: pureinfotech.com @ 2026-10-22 09:34:51 by W3 Total Cache
-->