<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Stick with Surface 2, don&#8217;t buy Surface RT/Pro (opinion)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pureinfotech.com/surface-2-vs-surface-rt-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pureinfotech.com/surface-2-vs-surface-rt-pro/</link>
	<description>Pureinfotech is the best site to get Windows help – featuring friendly how-to guides on Windows 10, Windows 11, Xbox, and other things tech, news, deals, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rann Xeroxx		</title>
		<link>https://pureinfotech.com/surface-2-vs-surface-rt-pro/#comment-3340</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rann Xeroxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pureinfotech.com/?p=50113#comment-3340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If MS were to bundle a RT with a touch cover and sell it for $199, that might be a good reason to get one over the $400+ w/o cover option.  The RT is still a better device for college students, corporate workers, etc.  And with the 8.1 update and the firmware fixed to battery drain, it actually works as advertised.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If MS were to bundle a RT with a touch cover and sell it for $199, that might be a good reason to get one over the $400+ w/o cover option.  The RT is still a better device for college students, corporate workers, etc.  And with the 8.1 update and the firmware fixed to battery drain, it actually works as advertised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mauro		</title>
		<link>https://pureinfotech.com/surface-2-vs-surface-rt-pro/#comment-3230</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pureinfotech.com/?p=50113#comment-3230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Rolo, you&#039;re right. The reason why Surface Pro appears in the article is because I wrote hours before Microsoft announced the tablet for professional will be discontinued after the launch of the second generation.

PS: I&#039;m adding a note to this article.

Thanks,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Rolo, you&#8217;re right. The reason why Surface Pro appears in the article is because I wrote hours before Microsoft announced the tablet for professional will be discontinued after the launch of the second generation.</p>
<p>PS: I&#8217;m adding a note to this article.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ROLO_ONFIRE		</title>
		<link>https://pureinfotech.com/surface-2-vs-surface-rt-pro/#comment-4302</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ROLO_ONFIRE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 05:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pureinfotech.com/?p=50113#comment-4302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe only the 1st gen RT will still be on sale, not the Pro]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe only the 1st gen RT will still be on sale, not the Pro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: pureinfotech.com @ 2026-10-30 19:11:27 by W3 Total Cache
-->