<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Windows 10 update history tracker	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pureinfotech.com/windows-10-update-history-tracker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pureinfotech.com/windows-10-update-history-tracker/</link>
	<description>Pureinfotech is the best site to get Windows help – featuring friendly how-to guides on Windows 10, Windows 11, Xbox, and other things tech, news, deals, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 14:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Edgar Antonio Edward Alvarez R		</title>
		<link>https://pureinfotech.com/windows-10-update-history-tracker/#comment-15739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgar Antonio Edward Alvarez R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pureinfotech.com/?p=75171#comment-15739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, I was reading this to see if there was anyway I was getting the november update soon or if I was already getting the features included in the forecoming build already. my build, as reported by Winver and in the watermark at desktop is &quot;build 18999.vb_release.191004-1432&quot;. Here I found this build reported as part of version 2003, that kind of shocked me, so Im now more confused than before: my version is not 2003, nor 1909, its 1903. So, its my build a little weird or this list is wrong in some way?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I was reading this to see if there was anyway I was getting the november update soon or if I was already getting the features included in the forecoming build already. my build, as reported by Winver and in the watermark at desktop is &#8220;build 18999.vb_release.191004-1432&#8221;. Here I found this build reported as part of version 2003, that kind of shocked me, so Im now more confused than before: my version is not 2003, nor 1909, its 1903. So, its my build a little weird or this list is wrong in some way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://pureinfotech.com/windows-10-update-history-tracker/#comment-15552</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2019 06:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pureinfotech.com/?p=75171#comment-15552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks, very helpful. There&#039;s a small error on the page. Ctrl+F for &quot;7134.753&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, very helpful. There&#8217;s a small error on the page. Ctrl+F for &#8220;7134.753&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sekundez13		</title>
		<link>https://pureinfotech.com/windows-10-update-history-tracker/#comment-7235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sekundez13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pureinfotech.com/?p=75171#comment-7235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[my Windows 10 1709 64bit build is 16299.402, do i need to install the update one by one from build 16299.431 to 16299.522 or just go to the latest 16299.522? i don&#039;t want to use automatic update its eating my bandwidth largely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my Windows 10 1709 64bit build is 16299.402, do i need to install the update one by one from build 16299.431 to 16299.522 or just go to the latest 16299.522? i don&#8217;t want to use automatic update its eating my bandwidth largely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: pureinfotech.com @ 2026-06-01 03:29:13 by W3 Total Cache
-->